biosdevname hitting rawhide

Joe Nall joe at nall.com
Wed Dec 1 00:36:17 UTC 2010


On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:29:32PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Matt Domsch wrote:
>>>>> Yes, your system, on new install, or if you delete
>>>>> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and the HWADDR lines from
>>>>> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*, will then use the new names.
>>> specifically, em0 for the above device, and em<Type Instance>  for the
>>> second NIC specified in SMBIOS...
>> 
>> OK. Perhaps the wiki should be updated to state the feature works more 
>> generically (SMBIOS 2.6+) and not for just Dell/HP systems?
> 
> I've done so now.
> 
>> Interesting work, Matt. I'm surprised the Unix purists who would fight 
>> you to death to keep sendmail on desktops would allow you to change the 
>> almighty eth* naming scheme.
> 
> I've caught flack for years - that's why this is just now happening.
> The previous released version of biosdevname was over 3 years ago -
> the pushback was against changing the eth* naming scheme.  But there's
> no other way to do it.  I wish there was.

As someone who deals with HP DL580 boxes with 6+ NICs routinely, this is good stuff. Deterministic naming of the built in NICs will simplify installation instructions for us.

Are the internal names going to be lomX or emX?

joe




More information about the devel mailing list