ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 12/12/2010 06:10 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:27AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>   >  Dave Jones wrote:
>   >
>   >  >  On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>   >  >
>   >  >   >  The problem here is that some maintainers doesn't want ABRT reports at
>   >  >   >  all even those not yet reported...
>   >  >
>   >  >  It's arguable that such people are 'maintainers' at all if this is the
>   >  >  case. I find it quite sad that we have packagers who don't care about the
>   >  >  quality of what they are packaging beyond the specfile.
>   >
>   >  … says the maintainer of the one package in Fedora for which ABRT reports
>   >  the bugs directly upstream.
>
> I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but there's a pretty big difference
> between completely ignoring automatically filed bugs (regardless of where they're filed),
> and automatically filing those bugs upstream.
>
> Apropos of nothing: kerneloops reporting seems to have been broken ever since
> we switched from using the kerneloops client to abrt, but that's another story..

- I reported quite a few oops using abrt (even found them on the koops 
server), but it's quite some time since I checked if it's still working, 
I'll test that tmrw

>
> 	Dave
>