FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)
mmaslano at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 13:32:16 UTC 2010
----- "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:14:13AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> >----- "Matthias Clasen" <mclasen at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your
> >> is
> >> very convincing.
> >My packages are rarely tested and I forget them in testing phase for
> >long time. Also fixing BR don't need testing. I simply need push
> >immediately the new/fixed package.
> If nobody is testing your packages sitting in updates-testing, then
> maybe the
> users of that package aren't hitting whatever you're fixing or aren't
> having other issues. What is the benefit of pushing an update if
> nobody cares?
They don't care about bodhi and probably they don't know about it.
> Also, doing an _update_ to fix a BR seems rather absurd. If there is
> functional change to the package when doing the BR change, then there
> is really
> no reason to push an update for that. The same is true for spec file
> changes, or any other change that has no real impact to the package at
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the devel