FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Garrett Holmstrom]

On 2/26/2010 11:07, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
> consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
> of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
> smoke test.  Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
> that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
> direct relationship.  Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
> initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing
> stuff.

Forgive me if I'm missing something, but isn't that QA's job?  Maybe 
what we really need is a push for more QA people.