fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 17:18:47 UTC 2010
Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
> > > I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
> > >
> > > rawhide:
> > > fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
> > > All repos except for rawhide disabled. Rawhide enabled.
> > > This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> > > version goes up each time we branch. 13, 14, 15, etc...
> >
> > How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
> > repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?
>
> That might work, but would cause me some more shuffling each time I
> branch the master for a Fedora release. What's the net positive gain
> here?
Mainly, it removes the repository definitions in rawhide that don't make
sense - the release, updates, updates-testing, etc. repos won't work anyway
unless you change $releasever in some way.
Bill
More information about the devel
mailing list