FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)
oget.fedora at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 19:32:45 UTC 2010
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:49:00PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> Though, in theory, fewer updates means a higher percentage of them can be
>> >> tested which means quality goes up.
>> > Even if this might start another flamewar ... I like the idea of
>> > having less updates.
>> > The "the version number changed so we need to update the fedora
>> > package" attitude needs to stop.
>> May I ask why? Can you elaborate on why there is such a "need"? Who
>> "need's this?
> lots of people. Some want to review changes manually and udpate only "important"
Exactly! And we have a good tool for this. People can opt to do
selective updates. They can just ignore the "Enhancement" updates and
do the "Bugfix" updates only. They can even do a subset of these
bugfix updates if they consider the bugfixes not important.
I didn't see many users complaining that there are too many updates.
But I saw many pissed off users because they don't have certain
updates and because they are told to wait 6 months.
More information about the devel