Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

[Tomas Mraz]

On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:42 +0200, Karel Klic wrote: 
> On 07/13/2010 06:03 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > This is why I'm so surprised to see gpg be deprecated in f13. Upstream
> > is supporting both and the manpage even indicates that the binary should
> > be gpg2.
> >
> > I don't see any reason for it to have been removed in f13, and am
> > willing to help maintain it.
> 
> We could also ask original maintainers of gnupg, if they are willing to 
> co-maintain it.
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnupg

I am not interested in co-maintaining gnupg-1. However I do not oppose
to revive it in koji.
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb