-upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts
tgl at redhat.com
Wed Jun 2 19:27:56 UTC 2010
Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> writes:
> If you can make everyone move away from sysv to something else, then by
> all means I'll do my best to aid in patches, but I don't have much
> confidence since everything that has been said about systemd has been
> said of upstart a few years ago. Instead of reinventing the wheel time
> and time again, there are other features that deserve attention.
Quite. As a packager looking on from the sidelines, this discussion
leaves me wondering why I should expend my non-copious free time on
implementing upstart^H^H^Hsystemd^H^H^Hmaybe something else next year
init scripts. I'll just stick with the tested sysv ones, thanks.
regards, tom lane
More information about the devel