bodhi statistics

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 06/09/2010 10:48 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>   
>> Well the only person I see mentioning quality is Kevin. And for some
>> reason he is expecting it immediately
>>     
> You can't claim that there are "shortcomings in our testing" (the exact 
> words Luke used!) without a metric of quality. A shortcoming in testing 
> means less testing was done than needed. If the packages have good quality, 
> that means more testing is NOT needed, no matter what the actual amount of 
> testing was.
>   

Packages without any testing is of unknown quality.   If someone doesn't
test them before pushing, users are unknowingly playing that role. 

Rahul