Refining the update queues/process [Was: Worthless updates]

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Wed Mar 3 06:17:44 UTC 2010


Seth Vidal wrote:
> At the risk of complicating the world would it make any sense for us to
> have (in increasing order of importance)
> 
> updates-testing
> updates
> updates-important
> 
> packages that are security or critical go from updates-testing to
> updates-important - and that happens as necessary
> 
> all other updates go from updates-testing to updates once a month.

And what problem would that solve? All I see is it causes problems for those 
people who need the updates you don't judge "important".

        Kevin Kofler



More information about the devel mailing list