FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:11 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:19:48 -0800, Jesse wrote:
> > 
> > > Extras had significantly fewer packages,
> > 
> > Well, Fedora Extras 6 (x86_64) contained 5129 packages, which is only 300 less
> > than F11 stable updates.
> > 
> > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/repoview/index.html
> 
>  *sigh*, I almost managed to not respond to any of these threads today.
> Anyway (trying to say just the facts):
> 
> % yum repolist --releasever=11 updates
> repo id               repo name                                   status
> updates               Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates                9,390
> repolist: 9,390
> 
> ...and it's only ~65% done. That also doesn't take into account the fact
> that we've released ~17k F11 updates, which I'm pretty sure didn't
> happen for F6 extras.
> 

This probably won't go well unless you two are talking about the right
terms.  I believe that Michael was talking srpm numbers, where you
appear to be talking binary numbers.  Those are obviously not going to
match up.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100304/d918d706/attachment.bin