FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[James Antill]

On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 18:30 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:11 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Well, Fedora Extras 6 (x86_64) contained 5129 packages, which is only 300 less
> > > than F11 stable updates.
> > > 
> > > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/repoview/index.html
> > 
> > % yum repolist --releasever=11 updates
> > repo id               repo name                                   status
> > updates               Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates                9,390
...
> This probably won't go well unless you two are talking about the right
> terms.  I believe that Michael was talking srpm numbers, where you
> appear to be talking binary numbers.

 The Michael gave was for binary packages in FC 6 x86_64 extras:

% GET http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/ | \
  fgrep '.rpm' | \
  wc -l
5129

...maybe he thought that was srpms though.