Fedora 13 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting: 2010-03-04 @ 01:00 UTC Recap

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 05:32 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:53 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> We should change or refine the Freeze Policy page then.  Having different
> >> definitions of what is required for alpha to go out and what can go in
> >> after alpha leads to incorrect expectations on the part of developers.
> > 
> > I agree. I think probably all we need to do is remove the weasel-word
> > 'testable' and give a more solid definition there.
> 
> Well, the Freeze Policy page is about targets feature owners should meet, 
> not about Alpha blockers.

Sure, but 'testable' is equally meaningless in both contexts.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net