Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think that new versions should, as a general rule, be pushed, unless there 
> is a good reason NOT to push a particular new version (feature regressions, 
> known unfixed new bugs as found during testing, requires manual 
> intervention, breaks compatibility with existing user data etc.). (And of 
> course, if there are such reasons, the update MUST NOT be pushed. That's 
> what distinguishes the updates from Rawhide, and it's an important 
> distinction, because it defines stability from the user's point of view.) 

Fundamental point of view difference.  You take the point of view of
push everything all the time /unless/ there is a good enough reason not
to.

Others take the point of view of not updating anything unless there is a
good enough reason /to/.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100312/96310abf/attachment.bin