Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Jaroslav Reznik]

On Wednesday 31 March 2010 04:26:12 Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
> > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
> > an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
> > the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX.
> > But
> > if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed
> > UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually
> > fixed or not.
> 
> +1 on this !  I thought it was just me.  I've given up on reporting bugs
> largely because of this issue.

So please - start reporting again - I hope I explained what does "UPSTREAM" 
resolution mean. I can't promise you, we (Fedora, KDE SIG, KDE upstream or 
whoever) fix the bug but...

Jaroslav 
-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/