Fedora release model (was Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17))
lists at sapience.com
Mon Nov 22 18:47:55 UTC 2010
On 11/22/2010 01:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:23 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> * A major version should be imposed every 6 months if it
>> has not for some reason.
> Why? Your idea of tying version bumps to actual changes in the product
> rather than an arbitrary timeline is an interesting one, but then having
> a backstop forced version bump every six months even if there is no
> relevant change completely undercuts the idea.
Good point ... was thinking it was a way to ensure anaconda keeps
pace but you're right ... it should follow the actual changes ...
Do you have any suggestions how to manage ensuring that each ISO
snapshot has a working anaconda ?
More information about the devel