Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Till Maas]

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they 
> >>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or 
> >>> proventester if critpath).
> >>
> >> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
> >> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
> >>
> >> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
> >> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> > 
> > Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non
> > crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default
> > non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed
> > since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement.

> I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates.

But this means that the update is automatically pushed to stable, not
that the update is approved and then pushed to stable when the
maintainer requests it.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101123/6ad9556e/attachment.bin