Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming
opensource at till.name
Tue Nov 23 07:32:51 UTC 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they
> >>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or
> >>> proventester if critpath).
> >> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody. Total of +2. Non
> >> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
> >> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere. We /default/ the karma
> >> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> > Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non
> > crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default
> > non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed
> > since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement.
> I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates.
But this means that the update is automatically pushed to stable, not
that the update is approved and then pushed to stable when the
maintainer requests it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101123/6ad9556e/attachment.bin
More information about the devel