Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Jesse Keating]

On 11/22/10 11:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>>>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they 
>>>>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or 
>>>>> proventester if critpath).
>>>>
>>>> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
>>>> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
>>>>
>>>> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
>>>> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
>>>
>>> Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non
>>> crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default
>>> non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed
>>> since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement.
> 
>> I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates.
> 
> But this means that the update is automatically pushed to stable, not
> that the update is approved and then pushed to stable when the
> maintainer requests it.
> 
> Regards
> Till
> 

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that's what you were arguing about.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating