Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Nov 23 16:26:25 UTC 2010
On 11/22/10 11:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:33:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>>>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they
>>>>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or
>>>>> proventester if critpath).
>>>> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody. Total of +2. Non
>>>> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
>>>> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere. We /default/ the karma
>>>> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
>>> Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non
>>> crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default
>>> non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed
>>> since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement.
>> I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates.
> But this means that the update is automatically pushed to stable, not
> that the update is approved and then pushed to stable when the
> maintainer requests it.
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that's what you were arguing about.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
More information about the devel