headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Nov 29 16:55:34 UTC 2010
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:43 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even
> > if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not
> > be completed in the tag?
> Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)
If you set off a process which requires a ton of work to be done, and
you only do 500kg of work, then you're still creating a problem, even
though you did a lot of work. :)
> and hoping to engage some of the rest of the Haskell SIG
> to help with the rebuilds. But I will try to coordinate
> better next time and make sure all packages get rebuild
> in the -ghc tag to avoid any broken deps.
thanks, that'd be great.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the devel