headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

[Jens Petersen]

----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:43 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages,
> even
> > > if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds
> could not
> > > be completed in the tag?
> > 
> > Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)
> 
> If you set off a process which requires a ton of work to be done, and
> you only do 500kg of work, then you're still creating a problem, even
> though you did a lot of work. :)

Who said there were a hundred packages - we're not there yet...

Having said with the new hask metadata ghc dependency breakage
will get even more noisy noisy going forward? :-/