x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform
wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
Tue Sep 28 13:59:27 UTC 2010
On 09/28/2010 03:58 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/28/2010 12:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 09/27/2010 10:03 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>>>> If anything I would expect the 32bit Desktop Live torrent download
>>>>> activity to be lower because of the promotion of the direct download
>>>>> link of that particular iso. The splits in 32bit and 64bit download
>>>>> activity in the torrent server is very suggestive of a continued
>>>>> preference for 32bit installs regardless of what we promote.
>>>> Sure, but the question is how much of that is simply due to a lack of
>>>> awareness. To a first order approximation, if you have 64-bit
>>>> hardware, then a 64-bit spin is better. We know that, but how many of
>>>> our users do? The strong suggestion we make is that 32-bit is the
>>>> default, and in the absence of any other information I'll always go
>>>> for the default. As will most people...
>>> May I chip in another thought here? Although in principle it is
>>> better if 64 bit versions are used on capable hardware there still
>>> remains a series of issues with some code - eg firefox and thunderbird
>>> are not always built for 64 bit
>> Huh? Sure they are.
> Some people use nightlies for example -
> Here there are no 64 bit versions that I am aware of?
> I do this when the stock version is somewhat behind even the stable
> release from mozilla. eg in f12 the current thunderbird is 3.1.4 but
> the current f12 version is 3.0.7, and similar for firefox. Yet this is
> still a supported release - yes f13 is up to current stable releases
> from mozilla for both of these. However in the mozilla filestore for
> latest stable for thunderbird at:
> there is no 64 bit version, so if running 64 bit f12 then it would be
> necessary to install the 32 bit thunderbird and make sure that
> necessary 32 bit libraries were also installed to make it run?
Maybe there's something that I miss here, but the fact that the mozilla
devs do not find necessary (or maybe they do not have the computing
power...) to build 64bit binaries each day ( but mind that they DO build
the 4 beta series for x86_64 ! ) has nothing to do with fedora's policy
about 64bit apps, does it ?
More information about the devel