librsvg2 unmaintained?

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Mon Feb 21 18:14:16 UTC 2011

On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 19:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> In bugzilla 553069 many of the dupes are false positives due to ABRT
> running wild with non-working detection of duplicates.

For the tenth time, this is a really unhelpful way of looking at things.
"Detecting duplicates" is not some sort of simple, 'digital' operation
which either works or doesn't; it's a hugely complicated, much more
'analog' area. You can't say abrt has 'working' or 'non-working'
detection of duplicates. It detects some - quite a lot, actually - and
misses others. The abrt devs are always working to make it detect more.
If you see a case where it misses duplicates, the correct thing to do is
not passively-aggressively whine about it on a mailing list, but contact
the abrt developers to report it, with data.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

More information about the devel mailing list