Services that can start by default policy feedback

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Feb 28 17:03:03 UTC 2011


On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi (kevin at scrye.com) said: 
> > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> > and be able to apply updates, etc" 
> > 
> > At least that was my thought. 
> > 
> > I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define
> > these. 
> > 
> > Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by
> > default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"
> 
> It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a
> little weird.

well, the arbiter of what's critpath is supposed to be the critpath
policy, not comps. Comps is just how the policy is implemented.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list