Services that can start by default policy feedback
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Feb 28 17:03:03 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi (kevin at scrye.com) said:
> > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> > and be able to apply updates, etc"
> > At least that was my thought.
> > I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define
> > these.
> > Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by
> > default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"
> It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a
> little weird.
well, the arbiter of what's critpath is supposed to be the critpath
policy, not comps. Comps is just how the policy is implemented.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the devel