Services that can start by default policy feedback

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Mon Feb 28 17:03:03 UTC 2011

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi (kevin at said: 
> > Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> > required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> > and be able to apply updates, etc" 
> > 
> > At least that was my thought. 
> > 
> > I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define
> > these. 
> > 
> > Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by
> > default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"
> It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a
> little weird.

well, the arbiter of what's critpath is supposed to be the critpath
policy, not comps. Comps is just how the policy is implemented.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

More information about the devel mailing list