Development only package?

[Richard Shaw]

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
> The tarball (I actually downloaded the zip but I hope that upstream made the
> tarball contain identical files :-)  seems to compile fine on its own:
>
> cd scripts
> cmake CMakeLists.txt
> make
> ls -al libpugixml.a
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 badger badger 342992 Jul  8 09:42 libpugixml.a

Thanks, I don't know why I didn't look there, I guess I was looking
for some sort of makefile in the root of the archive.


>> Should I package it as "pugixml-devel" only? Or just "pugixml"?
>>
> Since only static libraries are created you should be able to use these
> guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

I'll take a look. Thanks!

Richard