PA 1.0 for FC16?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:

> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
> >
> > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
> > after the competition.
> 
> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.

I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
maintainers before asking FESCo. 

On the pro side we have: 

- Wine needs it. 

On the con side we have: 

- Lots of changes? (I have no idea). 
- High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?

Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
into f16 with more specificity? 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111008/26c42a3e/attachment.bin