submitters +1ing their own packages
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 15:32:55 UTC 2011
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:17:35AM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 05:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > As someone on the other side of this (although not strongly, I could
> > be convinced), I don't think thats my concern at all...
> >
> > * As a maintainer you should only be pushing an update you feel
> > works/fixes something anyhow. Shouldn't that be an implied +1 always
> > from the maintainer?
>
> Except that some maintainers build packages and submit them without
> testing them at all.
>
I do this when a bugfix is worthy enough to push to multiple releases but
I only test on a subset of those releases. That the bug has been fixed is
pretty much tested by testing on a single release. That the fix does not
have side-effects on releases other than I'm using is only tested by the
people who run updates-testing on those other releases.
> I submit that we should be encouraging maintainers to test their builds,
> not discouraging it (which turning off selfkarma would do).
>
+1
> If the current rule is based on the fact that we would like 3 people to
> test besides the maintainer, we could just bump the autokarma thresshold
> from 3 to 4, and additionally encourage the maintainer to test.
>
Actually, we're only requiring 2 in the strictest case:
(Critpath in stable release):
# At the time of the request to stable, the update needs to have a Bodhi
karma sum of 2 AND
# One of these positive karma points needs to be from a Proventester
(All other packages) (list is not exhaustive):
# reach the positive Bodhi karma threshold specified by the updates
submitter
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Updates_to_.27critical_path.27_packages
I agree with you that if the idea is to get X people beyond the maintainer,
bumping the autokarma so that it is X+1 makes sense.
[snip other good points to which I have nothing to add]
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110908/e6e75678/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list