openssh: no pre-release sanity check? [Re: ssh-to-rawhide hangs
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Sep 12 21:52:32 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 04:03 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I haven't read the whole thread, but I also feel the rate of AutoQA development is slow. Unfortunately I don't know how to improve that, since there are just a few people working on it and they are also participating in release validation testing, test days and other QA activities.
> I am thankful for what AutoQA has already been able to accomplish. It
> has caught quite a few dependency breakages already and while I would
> like to see more (automatically unpush packages, block packages which
> have such breakages etc), it does serve a useful purpose now. What
> would be useful is more visibility into the roadmap and timeline.
AutoQA's a very transparent project, if you subscribe to the
autoqa-devel mailing list. They do all their goal-setting on that list
and in occasional public IRC meetings.
For e.g., here's the discussion about what to do in 0.7:
all the work on AutoQA is tracked in trac, and the tickets are
associated with appropriate milestones, so you can go to:
(active tickets by milestone) to see all the concrete things planned for
AutoQA, and get an idea of their current prioritization. (and get a feel
for all the stuff that still needs doing...)
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel