[systemd-devel] question

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Sep 13 21:28:00 UTC 2011

Am 13.09.2011 23:25, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: 
>> Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>>> thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in
>>> Fedora 15 with rebuilding the src.rpm , I don't get in trouble ? or we
>>> have some restrictions ? 
>>> I we don't have restriction why systemd Fedora packager don't update
>>> them on Fedora 15? 
>> because they tend to throw out a dist-upgrade with unfinished replacements
>> and do not care about bring improvements to the users because they can
>> jump to the next dist-upgrade and hope that no other subsystem is
>> replaced with a public beta
>> systemd-26-9.fc15
>> systemd-35-1.fc16
>> this is a bad joke in the middle of life-cycle and would be only acceptable if
>> F15 and it's version of sytemd would have been perfect but it was not
> I know examples of jumps in middle of a life-cycle like kernel 38 -> 40 
> Networkmanager to 0.9 and we leave happy with it. I will give more
> examples to not personalize the issue, kde for example and many others
> (hopefully).
> Mirco Tischler said "I used the systemd packages from f16 on a f15
> system and they worked just fine for me."
> So Fedora guys what you are waiting for ? update systemd please , should
> I open a report in bugzilla ? 

please open a bugreport - maybe they would hear if i am not would be the
only person who is unhappy about what was done with F15 but all others
out there are silent and hoping for wonders

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110913/f8e11a45/attachment.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list