Mozilla plugins packaging [Re: SELinuxDenyPtrace: Write, compile, run, but don't debug applications?]

Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat.com
Tue Apr 10 13:24:41 UTC 2012


On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:07:45 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > This is still unrelated to the point whether Fedora is a Free distro or
> > not (it is not due to Linux firmwares - this part is known). So why isn't
> > Flash + acroread etc. also installed by default or be available in
> > repositories?
> 
> Because Fedora IS a Free Software distribution,

OK. So what is the difference that Mozilla plugins repository is preconfigured
but RPMfusion/RPMforge/Adobe repositories are not preconfigured.

I find these proprietary repositories have equal attributes, don't they?

Either Fedora forbids accessibility of any non-Free software and therefore it
should forbid also Mozilla plugins.

Or Fedora is OK with installing non-Free software into it but then the Adobe
repository should be made preconfigured because it is even significantly more
convenient for end-user than the already preconfigured Mozilla repository.


Thanks,
Jan


More information about the devel mailing list