Summary/Minutes for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2012-12-05)

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 12/07/2012 05:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:51:43PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 12/07/2012 04:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>>> <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I am not sure why do you want to categorize it by size and impact, when it
>>>>> will be autocategorized by feedback on ML.
>>>> It's common knowledge that you cant autocategorized by feedback on Mailing
>>>> list regardless what's it's for. ( For obvious reasons )
>>>>
>>>>> The only think matters is that the Feature is widely advertised and that
>>>>> the community can provide early feedback.
>>>> No that is not enough because in the end you will only get feedback from
>>>> users of those feature not necessary from developers of other components
>>>> that might get affected by that feature.
>>> Advertising the feature on the _devel_ list is intended precisely to
>>> get feedback from developers of other possibly affected components.
>> Think broader than single announcment to an single mailing list
>> since features more often enough touch more then one part of the
>> community...
> So your proposition is??

For example using the official distribution announce mailing list which 
should reach broader audience then just -devel if people are inclined to 
go down this path.

JBG