fedup: does not verify source
Simo Sorce
simo at redhat.com
Mon Dec 17 03:00:28 UTC 2012
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:15 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
> <bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> wrote:
> Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that
> was both
> secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people
> are being
> discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported",
> removing
> the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a
> regression, and quite irresponsible.
>
> I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982
>
> No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but
> having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just
> unacceptable.
Why do we even need fedup ?
I already upgraded 2 machines with yum distro-sync w/o many issues[1].
I do not understand why there isn't work on making a yum plugin if
something out of the ordinary needs to be done to upgrade instead of
coming up with new tools every time.
Simo.
[1] One issue with policykit (on both machines) where it wouldn't work
and slow down login and many other operations resolved simply with 'yum
reinstall PolicyKit'
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the devel
mailing list