Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2012-12-19)

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:47:58PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:42:14AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > However, you also miss my point.  Adam's message was saying that the
> > guidelines forced people to use libexecdir and then went on to point out the
> > drawbacks of forcing specifically libexecdir on upstreams that didn't have that
> > coded in.  So, as I said, in that context it's meaningless to bring up
> > arguments that are only addressed to libexecdir because %{_libdir} is an
> > alternative.
> 
> I think you miss my point. Where consistency across architectures is 
> desired, %{_libdir} isn't an option, so in the absence of an exception 
> the guidelines force people to use libexec.
> 
Please re-read my email to see how I addressed your concerns in my first
paragraph. This paragraph was to show how my email was responding to the
context in Adam's email.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121221/605f4948/attachment.sig>