/usrmove? -> about the future
aph at redhat.com
Mon Feb 13 09:56:46 UTC 2012
On 02/10/2012 07:12 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> Given all that, it seems only logical to conclude that Fedora really
>> _isn't_ primarily intended for use as a production server.
> Bingo, which is why it's important for people like me who do it to
> realize what they're getting into and take some responsibility for
> that choice, like with any other technological choice. If you aren't
> will to either take downtime for Anaconda or preupgrade, or do lots of
> fresh installs, or mess with yum upgrades, use RHEL/CO/SL/Etc. Not
> for the feint of heart, and I sure as heck don't do it at work. :)
For what it's worth, I *do* use it at work and on the whole
I have very little trouble. Yes, upgrading can be a PITA, but
it's usually just a few hours. I don't mind.
More information about the devel