[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> said:
> b) unretirement
> 
> This could be pretty massive changes. If something was retired years
> ago, the entire spec could be very different. Or it could have been
> yesterday. But making the time variable for re-review makes it much
> more complex. Last time we looked at this, it was an easy way to tell
> if something needed re-review. Is it orphaned? then just take it. Is it
> retired? then re-review it. 

I would think that making it release based rather than time based should
be okay.  If there have been N released shipped without package foo,
then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or 2).

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.