[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:57 -0600
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> wrote:

> Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> said:
> > b) unretirement
> > 
> > This could be pretty massive changes. If something was retired years
> > ago, the entire spec could be very different. Or it could have been
> > yesterday. But making the time variable for re-review makes it much
> > more complex. Last time we looked at this, it was an easy way to
> > tell if something needed re-review. Is it orphaned? then just take
> > it. Is it retired? then re-review it. 
> 
> I would think that making it release based rather than time based
> should be okay.  If there have been N released shipped without
> package foo, then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or
> 2).

Possibly, but that info isn't super easy to find. You would need to
look at the scm-commits list to see when it was retired. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120120/88bb4aa5/attachment-0001.sig>