DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha
dcbw at redhat.com
Thu Mar 1 14:45:19 UTC 2012
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Jerry James
> > Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
> > related to the issues discussed in this thread?
> Hard to tell, without (preferably debug-level) logs. I have the same
> problem you're describing occur in 0.9.2-1 (see bug #797524), but I've
> not seen it with 0.9.3-0.2.git20120215.
0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if
IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's connected, and continue IPv6 in
the background. And vice versa.
More information about the devel