RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Mar 20 18:20:52 UTC 2012
On 3/20/12 11:18 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> We're starting now, that's what the secondary architecture is for.
>> no need for ARM to be a primary architecture for Fedora to be "ready" for
> No, Fedora ARM started years ago. There comes a point where a secondary
> cannot continue to grow. To become more than it is, it needs the
> support and interest of the main Fedora community. We are reaching that
> point. That is why we are having this discussion.
Honestly I've yet to see a succinct list of reasons why secondary arch
is no longer good enough for the ARM effort, for at least the next few
releases. I may have missed it in the flurry of emails and debate,
anybody care to recap it for clarity?
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
More information about the devel