ARM as a primary architecture
aph at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 09:06:40 UTC 2012
On 03/22/2012 02:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Exactly! Ultimately what we need is FESCo to document what are the
>> > requirements of being promoted to a primary architecture and then it's
>> > the ARM SIGs job of ensuring they adhere to the requirements, provide
>> > viable workable alternatives that are acceptable to FESCo, or provide
>> > proof that the requirement will be met within an agreed time frame.
> ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture before
> all the requirements are actually met!
Hold on, these requirements are something you just made up to suit
More information about the devel