tilda unmaintained? (was: Re: Examining -static package build timestamps in koji)

[Jon Ciesla]

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips
<johannes.lips at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
> created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
> actually happened.

I'll take a look.

-J

> I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the
> maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports.
> Johannes
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt
> <mschwendt at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:
>>
>> > >     21 link with flex libs        <-- flex doesn't change often,
>> > > though
>> >
>> > I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all.  It
>> > exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
>> > Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case.
>> >
>> > >     tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src  older than  flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm
>> > >       231 days
>>
>> Yeah, I figured so much.
>>
>> Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according
>> to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty:
>>
>>    http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda
>>
>> There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got
>> a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875
>>
>> --
>> Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64
>> loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie