procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))
mcepl at redhat.com
Tue May 15 19:01:00 UTC 2012
On 15.5.2012 14:03, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> There is. We had to change the name, since the former upstream
> is still somehow alive, but not enough to make us happy.
Do we? I mean if the old procps package will be killed in Fedora (which
I think it will be, right?) then what you describe could just happen by
changing URL in Source0, cannot it?
More information about the devel