RFC: Feature process improvements

[Marcela Maslanova]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
> 
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's
> > formally
> > introduce it:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
> 
> As discussed earlier, I liked the three-tier approach better, but I'm
> in
> favor of any improvement, which I think this clearly is.
> 
> I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
> features or
> critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM,
> for a
> specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical
> path
> component?
> 
> --
> Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁
>  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>

We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path
almost everything. Maybe splitting packages into tiers wouldn't be bad,
but I have no idea how to do it.
-- 
Marcela