RFC: Feature process improvements

[Matthew Miller]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing features or
> > critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
> > specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical path
> > component?
> I don't think we need a strict definition; in the proposal anyone can
> ask FESCo to consider a feature 'complex', so in practice, the
> threshold would be "somebody asked FESCo to" (and of course, that
> "somebody" can be the feature owner).


Then I think this fails to address the primary problem.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>