replacing rsyslogd in minimal with journald [was Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes]
John.Florian at dart.biz
John.Florian at dart.biz
Tue Oct 9 20:20:45 UTC 2012
> From: Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:55:30PM -0400, John.Florian at dart.biz wrote:
> > So maybe I should say that I think Fedora has always had it just about
> > right, IMHO. A very small, but functional system ready to grow and
can do
> > so with its own tools.
>
> Yeah, but there's _so much_ room to quibble over what "functional" means
> there. For cloud JEOS images, I think we need less than that (because
> extremely ridiculously minimal is what people are asking for).
Agreed. I think this also goes back to one of the requests here asking
for a definition of what "minimal" means. It also clearly shows the need
for other "minimal-like" installs.
> > Makes sense, but can someone please tell me what "comps" stands for? I
> > mostly know what they're used for, but have never guessed the acronym.
My
> > best guess just came to me after years of pondering: compilations?
Anyway,
> > I feel rather stupid asking this Q, but hey "there's no stupid Qs,
right?"
> > ;-)
>
> Once upon a time, the installer presented you with a dialog with the
title
> "Components to install". (I believe this even *predates anaconda*.)
>
> This is the list of those components. The "comps file".
Oh yes, of course! I remember the days ... having started with RHL 4.0.
Some acronyms are just more obvious than others and comps.* is just about
as cryptic as trans.* (arbitrary, fictional example) so thank you for
clearing that up.
--
John Florian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20121009/9a5d9b3e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list