Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-10-10)
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Oct 11 02:06:27 UTC 2012
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 21:22 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > Doesn't that come down to "it's random" in the combined case?
> > > > Well, not exactly. It's in actual install order. So if you
> > > But what if it's done by anaconda?
> > You can do a multiple desktop install with a kickstart file. That's one
> > of the 'what ifs'. And in that case, you won't really know which DM will
> > get enabled. But is it really a big deal? You'll get *a* DM enabled, at
> This is the case I'm thinking of, for university computer labs.
> It seems like having the preset policy RPMs to make the decision
> deterministic is a good idea.
Well if you're using a kickstart anyway, you can just stick a systemctl
enable command in %post, can't you?
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel