Broken dependencies: rubygem-pam

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Wed Apr 17 08:54:11 UTC 2013


Dne 17.4.2013 01:30, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On 15/04/13 05:30 AM, Josef Stribny wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> change ruby(abi) to Requires: ruby(release) as in guidelines [1]
>>
>> "Each Ruby package must indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter. 
>> Use ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that:"
>>
>> This is due to support both MRI and JRuby in next Fedora releases.
>
> Y'know, this one kinda made me scratch my head a little when I came 
> across it, because surely 'abi' is a more accurate term than 'release' 
> in the context of 'there are multiple different but compatible 
> interpretations of the same basic thing, and this is a virtual 
> dependency for packages which can happily use any of them'? I mean, 
> switching from the word 'abi' to the word 'release' because you now 
> have two things that provide the same...ABI...seems exactly 
> bass-ackwards :) but I may be missing something.

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2012-December/008798.html

Vít


More information about the devel mailing list