Overall rawhide package testing.

[Alec Leamas]

On 08/26/2013 03:50 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Parag N(पराग़) <panemade at gmail.com 
> <mailto:panemade at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>
>     On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alec Leamas
>     <leamas.alec at gmail.com <mailto:leamas.alec at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         As agreed  [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all
>         packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at
>         [2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue.
>
>         We have discussed sending email about these results to the
>         package owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it
>         might be good if you check your own packages, chances are that
>         something otherwise unnoticed is discovered. Please don't
>         forget the README.
>
>         For those interested in the  overall distribution, the package
>         by issue reports perhaps also might add something as well as
>         the 'stats' file in the top dir.
>
>
>
>      I see some of my packages listed and when I look for why its
>     listed, I can't figure out. I now need to run fedora-review on
>     those packages. If possible provide results directory with all
>     three log files to understand what is wrong in the package.
>
>
>    Thanks Alec for giving me some understanding on this on IRC. I 
> found http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/README and as 
> written there I see my packages are clean.
>
>
>
> [cut]
>
>
Just for others listening to this: all packages are listed, being in the 
list does not mean that the package is bad per se. See The README. And 
if you feel low due to some warnings, take some comfort in the 'stats' 
file. You are not alone ;)

--alec


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130826/81f04a0e/attachment-0001.html>