Fedora 18: WebApp and httpd 2.4 configuration

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:48:36 +0100
Miloslav Trmač <mitr at volny.cz> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration
> >> that we are about to release into the hands our our enduser base
> >> and how they should be handled are not considered high-level
> >> technical decision?
> >
> > What is the decision to be made? "Do we fix them"? Obviously yes.
> 
> ("Obviously"?  Per which release blocker criterion?)

I think Adam was saying we should fix them, but they can be 0 day
updates (or whenever they are fixed). 

> The way I understand Jóhann, the topic to escalate was a proposed
> removal of currently unorphaned packages from the distribution, which
> sounds like a quite reasonable topic for FESCo.

Sure. Then we got sidetracked. ;) 

> Such an escalation wouldn't fix F18, true.
> 
> In retrospect, the update to httpd 2.4 should probably have been a
> feature; that would make this problem visible by beta freeze.  FESCo
> already has "fixing features" on the agenda in a general sense, more
> thoughts on how to improve the process would definitely be welcome.
>     Mirek

Agreed. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130107/af26438a/attachment.sig>