Feedback wanted: Fedora Formulas

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
> > On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
> > And we are supposed to QA this how?
> 
> Like any software? 
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?

I'd welcome any QA thoughts/feedback. I think we would probibly have to
have guidelines at least somewhat worked out before we could figure out
how to test things. 

We could do something like what we do for packages, ie, a testing
collection and promotion to stable only happens with positive tester
feedback.

We could try and build into the process some kind of automated
testing/tooling. (search for forbidden items, runs in a virt that list
all files changed and diffs of those for review, etc. 

I think QA is definitely something to keep in mind when thinking about
the rest of the process... 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130108/0a64abb2/attachment.sig>