RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 07/22/2013 02:06 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 22/07/2013 15:38, Matthew Miller a écrit :
>
>>    Wait, did you just say Fedora _Core_?
>>
>>    Yes I did.
>>
>>    But, this is not a return to the old Core + Extras, because the line is
>>    drawn based on _what_ and _how_ rather than on who works for what company.
> Whatever explanation which can be given, "Core" is just the worst name
> to be used.
>
> For me, The merge Core + Extras => "Fedora" is just the most significant
> step for fedora project as a real community distro.
>
> Getting back to "Core" (even with a different definition) is just
> something I'd like to avoid because will be considered like a huge
> regression.
>
> Ex : I'm so disgusted that I don't ever have desire to read the rest of
> the doc.

He's just speaking of base/coreOS we can call it whatever we like once 
we have agreed which components it's actually made up of.

JBG