Unhelpful update descriptions

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:06 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> 
> I tend to agree here.  That being said, most of my package updates are
> something along the lines of "Update to upstream 2.5 release" -- would
> you find that descriptive enough, or still lacking in detail?

Personally I'd prefer some level of information beyond just "update to
release x.y.z", e.g. snippets from an upstream changelog (or a link,
that's great too). But primarily I'm concerned about seeing updates with
no description at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130311/de42fa22/attachment.sig>